Pre-Reading Poetry Activities for Secondary English (Before Analysis Begins)
I spend a lot of time teaching poetry, and in most lessons the end point is still line-by-line analysis: looking closely at language, identifying techniques, and building interpretations supported by evidence.
But this post isn’t about that stage.
This is about the pre-reading and pre-analysis work I do before we start annotating poems and pulling them apart. It’s the part of the process that helps students encounter a poem as a piece of writing first — to hear it, react to it, and form instincts — rather than seeing it immediately as something to decode.
When I say pre-analysis, I mean before we begin line-by-line analysis, before we label techniques, and before students are expected to explain what the poet is doing and why. And when I say pre-reading, I’m also talking about how I introduce poetry at a unit level, not just poem by poem.
Some of the activities in this post are ones I use before students even know a poem’s title or the poet’s name. Others work particularly well when teaching a collection of poems, such as several poems by the same poet or poems linked by a shared theme or topic — for example, WW1 poetry.
None of the activities here ask students to analyse. There are no quotations, no techniques, and no “what does this show?” questions. Instead, the focus is on emotional response, first impressions, and pattern-spotting — the groundwork that makes later analysis more confident and meaningful.
I’ll explore analysis activities and post-reading responses in separate posts. This one is about what happens before we ever get there.
Why Pre-Reading and Pre-Analysis Activities Matter
It’s tempting to begin poetry lessons by explaining the context and moving straight into line-by-line analysis. For some students, that approach works. For many others, it creates the impression that poetry is something you either understand immediately or don’t understand at all.
Pre-reading and pre-analysis activities slow that process down.
They give students space to encounter the poem before they are asked to explain it. Instead of searching for the “right” interpretation, students are encouraged to notice, react, and form instincts — all of which are valuable when analysis begins later.
Approaches like inventing titles, responding emotionally, or reading poems without context help students to:
◆ build confidence before technical language is introduced
◆ engage with tone, mood, and pattern rather than isolated techniques
◆ see poetry as something to experience, not just decode
◆ participate meaningfully without fear of being wrong
This is especially important when teaching poetry collections or themed units, such as WW1 poetry. Reading several poems first — without immediately attaching context or analysis — allows students to spot recurring ideas, concerns, and voices for themselves. When context is introduced later, it has something to attach to.
These activities don’t replace analysis. They prepare students for it. By the time you move into line-by-line reading, students already have a sense of what the poem feels like, what it might be circling, and why it matters — which makes close analysis more purposeful rather than mechanical.
Pre-Reading and Pre-Analysis Poetry Activities
The activities below are all designed to be used before close analysis begins. They work either at the start of a poetry unit or before reading an individual poem, and they focus on first impressions, emotional response, and pattern-spotting rather than terminology or evidence. None of them require annotation or quotations — the aim is to help students meet the poem with confidence before we start analysing how it works.
1. Poems Without Titles
This activity works particularly well at the start of a poetry unit, especially when you are introducing a selection of poems by the same poet or a collection of poems linked by a shared theme or topic. The poems are displayed around the room without titles, authors, or context, and students move around reading them at their own pace.
Students can chat quietly with each other as they read, or work independently and think things through on their own.
Why Use This Before Analysis
Removing titles and context encourages students to encounter each poem without preconceptions. Instead of searching for meaning straight away, they begin to notice tone, mood, and recurring ideas across the poems.
When used at the start of a unit, this approach helps students to form early impressions and spot patterns for themselves — which makes later context and analysis feel purposeful rather than imposed.
How to Run the Activity
◆ Print and display the poems around the classroom without titles or author names
◆ Ask students to move around the room and read the poems in any order
◆ Allow quiet discussion, or independent reading and reflection
◆ Encourage students to note first impressions, repeated ideas, or moments that stand out
◆ As they read, ask students to suggest a title for each poem and name them as they go
At this stage, there is no expectation that students analyse language or identify techniques.
Extension Ideas
◆ If all the poems are by the same poet, ask students to build a brief profile of the poet based on what they have read (interests, tone, concerns, possible time period)
◆ If the poems are thematically linked, ask students to identify what they think connects them and why
◆ Introduce the poet or theme afterwards and discuss which ideas students predicted accurately
2. Titles Only: Predicting Meaning Before Reading
In this activity, students are given only the titles of the poems in a unit before they read any of them. Working independently at first, they mind-map what they think each poem might explore, before sharing and discussing ideas as a class. This can also be run as a silent debate.
This works particularly well when introducing a poetry unit built around a shared theme or topic, or a selection of poems by the same poet.
Why Use This Before Analysis
Titles shape expectations. By focusing on titles alone, students begin to make predictions about subject matter, tone, and perspective without feeling the pressure to interpret language or “get it right”.
This activity activates prior knowledge and curiosity, making students more engaged when they encounter the poems themselves.
How to Run the Activity
◆ Display or hand out the poem titles from the unit
◆ Ask students to work independently to mind-map what they think each poem might be about
◆ Encourage speculative language rather than certainty
◆ Move into discussion, comparing ideas and predictions
◆ Alternatively, run this as a silent debate, with students responding to each other’s ideas in writing
At this stage, students do not need to justify their ideas with evidence.
Extension Ideas
◆ Ask students to revisit their predictions after reading the poems and note what surprised them
◆ Group titles by perceived themes or moods before reading
◆ Use predictions as a reference point later in the unit when analysing how expectations are confirmed or challenged
3. Draw What You Hear
In this activity, the poem is read aloud while students listen and draw the images that come to mind. The focus is on sound, rhythm, and atmosphere rather than understanding or interpretation.
This works well as an early encounter with a poem, particularly before any discussion of meaning or technique.
Why Use This Before Analysis
Hearing a poem read aloud foregrounds its musical and sensory qualities. By drawing what they hear, students are encouraged to respond instinctively to imagery, mood, and repetition without worrying about explanation or accuracy.
This is especially effective for students who struggle to articulate ideas verbally, as it gives them a different way into the poem.
How to Run the Activity
◆ Read the poem aloud once, slowly and clearly
◆ Ask students to listen and draw any images, shapes, or scenes that come to mind
◆ Reassure students that artistic skill is not the focus
◆ Read the poem a second time if needed
◆ Allow students time to look at and discuss each other’s drawings
There is no expectation that students explain their choices or analyse language.
Extension Ideas
◆ Ask students to identify which images appeared most frequently across the class
◆ Compare drawings and discuss why different people focused on different moments
◆ Revisit drawings later in the unit and link them to specific lines once analysis begins
4. Emotional Response First
Before any discussion of meaning or technique, students are given space to respond to a poem emotionally. After hearing or reading the poem, they record how it made them feel and which moments stood out to them.
This activity works well as a first response to a poem, particularly when teaching emotionally charged or challenging texts.
Why Use This Before Analysis
Students often assume poetry is about finding the “right” interpretation. Beginning with emotional response reframes poetry as something to be experienced before it is explained.
This approach validates instinct and personal reaction, helping students engage with poems more confidently when analysis begins later.
How to Run the Activity
◆ Read the poem together, either silently or aloud
◆ Ask students to write down one or two words describing how the poem made them feel
◆ Encourage students to note any moment or line they reacted to, without explanation
◆ Allow brief discussion to share responses if appropriate
There is no requirement to justify feelings or identify techniques at this stage.
Extension Ideas
◆ Create a class list of emotional responses and look for patterns
◆ Ask students to revisit their initial responses later and reflect on how their understanding has changed
◆ Use emotional responses as a starting point for later analytical questions
5. Questions Before Answers
Instead of asking students what a poem means, this activity asks them to generate questions about it before any discussion or analysis takes place. The focus is on uncertainty, curiosity, and what the poem invites the reader to wonder.
This works well immediately after a first read or read-aloud.
Why Use This Before Analysis
Students are often conditioned to believe that reading poetry is about finding answers. Asking questions first reframes poetry as something to think with rather than solve.
This approach:
◆ removes pressure to be correct
◆ validates confusion as part of reading
◆ encourages deeper engagement when analysis begins later
It also stops students defaulting to surface-level interpretations too quickly.
How to Run the Activity
◆ Read the poem together once
◆ Ask students to write down questions the poem raises for them
◆ Emphasise that questions can be about anything: meaning, voice, emotion, situation, or ambiguity
◆ Invite students to share or compare questions
◆ Collect questions on the board or display them anonymously
No answers are required at this stage.
Extension Ideas
◆ Sort questions into types (emotional, narrative, thematic)
◆ Revisit the questions during analysis and see which ones can be explored using evidence
◆ Use student questions to shape later discussion or written responses
Go Deeper into Poetry Pre-Reading Activities
Pre-reading and pre-analysis activities are most effective when they are used deliberately, rather than as a quick warm-up before “the real work” begins. Their purpose is not to avoid analysis, but to prepare students to analyse with confidence, curiosity, and independence.
When introducing poetry through activities like untitled readings, title prediction, or emotional response, the aim is to shift students away from seeing poems as puzzles to solve and towards seeing them as voices, experiences, and perspectives to encounter first.
To deepen the impact of pre-reading poetry activities, it can be useful to:
◆ Use the same activity across multiple poems so students begin to notice patterns rather than focusing on single texts
◆ Delay contextual information until students have formed their own impressions, allowing context to clarify rather than dominate meaning
◆ Encourage speculative language (“might,” “seems,” “suggests”) to reduce fear of being wrong
◆ Revisit early predictions later in the unit to show how understanding develops over time
◆ Treat uncertainty as productive, particularly with complex or emotionally challenging poems
These approaches are particularly powerful when teaching thematically linked poetry, where meaning emerges through comparison rather than immediate interpretation. Allowing students to encounter several poems first creates a shared foundation that makes later analysis more purposeful.
If you are looking for a place to start, World War One poetry works especially well with these strategies. The shared subject matter allows students to identify recurring concerns — voice, distance, suffering, protest — before historical context and close language analysis are introduced. You may find it helpful to explore 10 Best WWI Poems to Teach (And How to Teach Them) as a way into using these approaches across a unit.
Final Thoughts
Poetry often becomes difficult in classrooms not because the poems themselves are inaccessible, but because students are asked to analyse them before they have had time to encounter them as readers.
Pre-reading and pre-analysis activities create that space.
By slowing the process down, removing pressure to interpret immediately, and foregrounding instinct, emotion, and first impressions, these approaches help students build confidence before technical language enters the conversation. Analysis becomes something students are prepared for, rather than something done to them.
When students are allowed to hear a poem, react to it, question it, and notice patterns across texts, close reading feels meaningful rather than mechanical. Poetry becomes less about decoding and more about understanding how language carries experience, perspective, and feeling.
That groundwork matters. And when it is done well, everything that follows — analysis, comparison, and evaluation — becomes stronger because of it.
Choose Your Next Strategy
